DISCLAIMER: The tools, as they currently stand, are provided for research and informational purposes only. The underlying models, assumptions, data sources, and methodologies are experimental and might have not yet been peer-reviewed or independently validated. Outputs may be incomplete, uncertain, or inaccurate and should be interpreted with caution. The tools do not provide regulatory, medical, legal, toxicological, or professional risk assessment advice. For the time being, it must not be used as a substitute for expert judgment, regulatory review, or established risk-assessment frameworks, nor relied upon for decision-making related to human health, environmental protection, occupational safety, product registration, compliance, or policy.
Use of these tools for unlawful, harmful, misleading, or unethical purposes—including but not limited to regulatory circumvention, misrepresentation of risk, or inappropriate application to real-world pesticide use decisions—is strictly prohibited. The tool is provided “as is,” without warranties of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited to accuracy, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement.

Wind-erosion model

The SWIPPE model (SprInt WInd erosion model for PartIcle-phase PEsticides), developed within Work-Package 3 of SPRINT, estimates emissions of pesticide-laden dust from agricultural fields and their dispersion in the atmosphere. Building on existing wind erosion models, we adapted equations from APEX, as it incorporates vegetation cover alongside standard parameters such as surface roughness, field length, and climatic drivers. The model focuses on suspension processes, as these are the main contributors of fine particles (e.g. PM10) that can travel further distances. To link pesticide behavior in soil to atmospheric transport, SWIPPE integrates a sorption module (based on KOC values, as used in the PEARL model) and a Gaussian plume dispersion component with settling velocity by particle size. This framework allows us to simulate pesticide concentrations at downwind receptors with hourly resolution. Pesticide chemical conversion and wet deposition were not incorporated in this model.

To verify the model, we compared simulations against field measurements collected with an active air sampler in Valthermond, the Netherlands (Debler et al. 2024). Sixteen pesticides were selected for comparison, based on reported applications and sufficient detection frequencies. Model outputs were evaluated against measured concentrations by analyzing temporal patterns, cumulative values, and statistical bias, rather than standard regression metrics, given the limited number of paired data points. Despite uncertainties in input data such as soil moisture content and contributions from surrounding fields, SWIPPE captured temporal trends well, and in most cases, predicted concentrations were within the same order of magnitude as observations. This supports its use as a first step toward understanding particle-phase pesticide transport via wind erosion.

References:
  • Debler, F., Abrantes, N., Harkes, P., Campos, I., Gandrass, J., 2024. Occurrence and distribution of pesticides and transformation products in ambient air in two European agricultural areas. Science of the Total Environment 940, 173705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173705

Contact for model use/collaboration: d.m.figueiredo@uu.nl

Run the SWIPPE Model