DISCLAIMER: The tools, as they currently stand, are provided for research and informational purposes only. The underlying models, assumptions, data sources, and methodologies are experimental and might have not yet been peer-reviewed or independently validated. Outputs may be incomplete, uncertain, or inaccurate and should be interpreted with caution. The tools do not provide regulatory, medical, legal, toxicological, or professional risk assessment advice. For the time being, it must not be used as a substitute for expert judgment, regulatory review, or established risk-assessment frameworks, nor relied upon for decision-making related to human health, environmental protection, occupational safety, product registration, compliance, or policy.
Use of these tools for unlawful, harmful, misleading, or unethical purposes—including but not limited to regulatory circumvention, misrepresentation of risk, or inappropriate application to real-world pesticide use decisions—is strictly prohibited. The tool is provided “as is,” without warranties of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited to accuracy, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement.

Results - Tier 2

Summary

Aim of Tier 2

Test the Top 10 most concerning pesticides using lab-based (in vitro) models to study their effects on cells, in an individual way or as a mixture (Mixture of top 3 and 8).

Type of test used in Tier 2

  • Cytotoxicity assays → to see if the pesticides kill cells (standard EFSA Test)
  • Micronuclei assays → to detect DNA damage (standard EFSA Test)
  • Kidney cell assays → new model to test kidney effects (New SPRINT Indicator)
  • Organoid assays → 3D mini-organs to study complex cell responses (New SPRINT Indicator)

Results of Tier 2 (individual results are described in detail for each experiment)

  • Pesticides that have been tested in Tier 2 showed at least one positive signal for toxicity.
  • Pesticide mixtures proved to be consistently more detrimental, showing additive (non-synergistic) and linear dose-responses.
  • In general, the new SPRINT Indicators proved to be sensitive and relevant for different toxicological endpoints of interest but further validation is required for their use for risk assessment and pre-market evaluations..

Detailed reports

Tier 2 consisted of a series of in vitro studies:

  • cytotoxicity assays (EFSA Tests),
  • micronuclei assays (EFSA Test),
  • kidney cells assays (New SPRINT Indicator), and
  • organoid assays (New SPRINT Indicator).

The Top 10 pesticides of concern selected for in vitro testing in Tier 2 were: acetamiprid, cypermethrin, cyprodinil, deltamethrin, fluopyram, glyphosate, imazalil, lambda-cyhalothrin, tebuconazole, and the synergist piperonyl butoxide.

Two combination pesticide treatments were used. The first was named the Top 3 and was composed of acetamiprid + glyphosate + tebuconazole.

The second combination treatment was named the Top 8, containing: acetamiprid + cypermethrin + cyprodinil + deltamethrin + glyphosate + lambda-cyhalothrin + piperonyl butoxide (synergist) + tebuconazole.

In the following sections, the users will find detailed reports for different in vitro tests including their aims, methods and results.